If Sen. Ping Lacson wants to fully redeem his credibility and erase any and all doubts on his supposed involvement in the Dacer-Corbito murders, he had better answer a few more questions fast.
Lacson says he has an idea or information on who really is behind the crime, but won't reveal it for now because of lack of evidence.
He made one accusation after another against the administration of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (GMA) with hardly any proof. If he can do it then, why won't he do it now?
Lacson had admitted before he went into hiding that he had met with Cesar Mancao, who’s now the main witness against him, and Michael Ray Aquino in the US. He had said then that the two can vouch for his innocence in the Dacer-Corbito murders.
But WHY DIDN’T HE BRING THEM HOME, at once? Why did he prefer to be under a cloud of suspicion all these years instead of immediately coming out clean of the crime and redeeming his honor.
He had the money. He had the influence. He had the connections and the informants to protect them from threats to their lives, if f there were any.
As I’ve written in an earlier blog, any innocent man would readily grab the very first opportunity to prove that he had nothing to do with what he’s being accused of.
Lacson had claimed that Mancao was only forced by the administration of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (GMA) to implicate him in the Dacer-Corbito murders.
Then why HASN’T HE SUED MANCAO for oral defamation, or libel or grave slander up to now? As well as GMA and any other person who he thinks is responsible?
Especially considering the fact that GMA is no longer in power.
He claims the GMA administration forced the issuance of the arrest warrant against him.
Where’s the proof? What’s his basis? Does he have a witness?
The hunters of Lacson also need to explain something. Lacson said he DIDN’T NEED A DISGUISE during his days of hiding.
Then, what made it so difficult for lawmen to find him? How far did they go in looking for Lacson? How intense was the manhunt?
I’m just going by the facts. I’m not accusing Lacson of anything. We will be hearing a lot of political noise in the coming days on this issue and as I’ve said in an earlier blog, ask for proof and study it first before you draw your own conclusions. 30
when fire exist,a smoke will be visible.
ReplyDeletethe case of Sen. Lacson is not above the reach of law...but what matter most is he must make himself available before any judicial investigation or proceedings. Whether he is guilty or not, Sen. Lacson deserves to tell his tales and be heard. Well the fact that he emerged now, it is a welcome development and an opportunity for justice to prevail, hopefully.
ReplyDelete